-
Interview with Mrs Rose.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/144ocg73CSlD02la85JIH4xhfGMoYnl-iavwdgQQ5hkc/edit?usp=sharing10 A meeting with Mrs. Rose, my design teacher, provides valuable feedback, enhancing craftsmanship and presentation skills (Rubric: Craftsmanship, Presentation). -
Publishing learning and product goal on managebac
Having a learning goal ensures continuous improvement, addressing criteria like craftsmanship, stability, and originality, enhancing overall project quality. -
Confirmation for exhibit with Mr Matt.
I requested to have a different kind of exhibit for the final date of the personal project
Requesting a different presentation format for my personal project benefits me by enhancing clarity, meeting the rubric's criteria for presentation, and ensuring effective communication (Presentation). -
Request for contacts of experienced architects
Requesting contacts of experienced architects benefits by incorporating expert feedback, enhancing stability, structure, craftsmanship, and overall impact in architectural designs. -
Meeting with Mrs. Belen
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MqRavbaWHyuVIPS29IhB-GLoZpokpzKB0nrcae0mkGc/edit A meeting with Mrs. Belen, a Mozambican architect, provides valuable cultural insights, aligning with the "Research and Context" criterion. -
Personal Project meeting with advisor
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bjeKPU8-OtYMECViJkPfBDD4_-NODuDl/view?usp=drive_link The Personal Project meeting with the advisor offers valuable insights, aligning with the rubric's criteria for "Feedback Incorporation." Advisors provide guidance, addressing elements such as original design, stability, craftsmanship, and overall impact. -
Create process journal
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Vu8ef6ERjyRqZ8BSBLqTPJGOSPO-OfKSEg721JiNbnk/edit?usp=sharing https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1V2UdgC8R8__ZEjglW2TSApMH9r5MHWGX2XX0uh9ovAg/edit?usp=sharing Maintaining a detailed project journal aids self-reflection, meeting criteria for documentation and self-reflection, enhancing craftsmanship, and ensuring originality in design. -
"Exploring Aesthetic Preferences and Functional Priorities: In-Person Interviews on Design Perspectives among Students and Teachers"
conduct simple in-person interviews, face to face with students teachers anyone. and ask them which is more aesthetically pleasing and which they prefer based on looks. then ask them again which is more logical based on functionality
Exploring aesthetic preferences and functional priorities through in-person interviews benefits my project by informing original design (Criterion: Original Design). Understanding users' perspectives ensures relevance and positive impact (Criterion: Overall Impact). -
Week 1 of Course Complete
I am doing a 1-4 week course provided by the university of Sydney, aligning with the "Research and Context" criterion. -
Completion of week 2 module practice
in addition to module two practice quiz taken. 80% grade received -
completion of week 2 of course
-
Period: to
sketching designs
during this time period I consistently brain stormed ideas for my project and came up with a few after a bit of discussing with Mrs. Belen (a mentor i seek consistent guidance in throughout my entire project)