-
Timother W. v. Rochester School District
The courts appealed that the schools should require that all children with disabilities be provided with a free, appropriate, public education, with no exceptions. This ruling was very appropriate because it gives students with disabilities a chance of an education. -
Period: to
Honig v. Doe
The case came from when a student was suspended for violent and disruptive behavior that was related to his disability. The courts ruled that the state must provide services directly to students with disabilities when local school boards fail to do so. -
Period: to
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley.
The Rowley family filed a suit against the School District which they won. The ruling was for schools to provide students like Amy Rowley (Disabilities) with the services that they need in order to learn. The suit was filed so that students can have the proper materials to become educated. This act also helped teachers to better assist students who have disabilities. -
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley.
This was the first case based on PL 94- 142 to reach the supreme court. The court ordered for each child with disabilities the right to personalized program of instruction and the appropriate supportive services. This act is helpful to students today because it gives all children the opportunity to learn no matter if they have a disability. -
Honig v. Doe
Honig v. Doe is a case in which the Supreme Court ruled that children with disabilities cannot be excluded from school due to misbehavior that is disability related. If a student has been diagnosed with a disability that affects his or her behavior could not be placed on suspension or any other behavior disciplinary act. This act is being implemented in schools today to help protect the actions of a student who has a disability who may not be able to control their behavioral actions.