The history of the discipline of International Relations

  • First establishment of the discipline (Liberalism)

    First establishment of the discipline (Liberalism)
    As a reaction to the WW1 and to avoid wars : process of institutionalization of the International Relations in Europe --> teaching, research, think tanks, academic newspaper...
  • Edward Hallett Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis

    Edward Hallett Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis
    The book had a massiv influence on the discipline. It critizes the liberal state system. The liberalism is here responsible for the crisis and is nothing but an utopie.
  • Period: to

    1st "Great Debate"

    Ontological debate = What do we study ?
    Debate between liberalism and realism (dominance of realism)
  • Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations

    Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations
    After E.H. Carr, realist critique of liberal internationalism
    Very important text for the establishment of the discipline
  • Second establishment of the discipline

    The second establishment of the discipline comes with the Carr's and Morgenthau's texts as a critique of the dominant liberalism. What is the subject of the discipline ? The new answer is : international relations are about the distribution of power".
  • Period: to

    2nd "Great Debate"

    This is epistemological debate between behaviourism and traditionalism. How to aquire knowledges ?
    For behaviourists, economy can develop general laws to predict human behaviour. For traditionalists, the disciplin has to be more interpretative, more historical.
  • Period: to

    3rd "Great Debate"

    This is an ontological debate, called the "inter-paradigme" or "neo-neo" debate between neo-realism, neo-liberalism and the ermeging neo-marxism.
    Waltz, Keohane and Cox are the main thinkers representing those three theories.
    --> The consensus about the nature of the discipline is now replaced by a larger spectrum of approaches.
  • Period: to

    4th "Great Debate"

    This is an epistemological debate between rationalism (positivist approach) and constructivism; called the "post positivist debate". Which method to study International Relations is the most appropriate and efficient ?
    It has produced central questions for the discipline : What theory is about and what its purposes are ?