-
Great Debates
Discipline of International Relations evolves around four debates. All of them have their own ontological and epistemological framework. -
The First Great Debate
Born - Aberystwyth, the first Department of the University in Wales
Liberalism ↔︎ Realism
Main lines of thinking: classical diplomacy and balance of power
First era of liberal optimism → first establishment of International Relations and the new discipline became liberal
1930's - Great Economic Crisis - severe criticism
Raising a new question, new reference point → realism emerged
Edward Hallett Carr - one of the greatest realists
1950-60's - the double establishment of the discipline -
The Second Great Debate
Epistemological debate ('50-60's)
Behaviorism↔︎Traditionalism
Scientific↔︎Traditional methods
S.:emulate methods of the natural sciences - attempted to build a new theory of int. politics→disciplinary debate
T.:interpretive, more historical, attuned
Morgenthau's theoretical framework thought to be too impressionistic in nature
The discipline lagged behind the study of Economics - used a sophisticated methodology to test specific hypotheses
1960-70's:rapid proliferation of approached to the field -
The Third Great Debate
Ontological debate
Neorealism↔︎Neo-Marxism →neo-neo debate/interparadigm debate
Kenneth N. Waltz-neo-realist theory-struggle for int.system and for power, security
1970's-int.interdependence:neo-liberal approach→Robert O. Keohane,John Burton,Ernts Haas
Neo-Marxist:system of global dominance and dependence→North-South division - Robert Cow,Immanuel Wallerstein→deal with social forces, causes of inequalities
Phrase inter-paradigm debate-1970-80's-nature of the discipline-survived until this day -
The Fourth Great Debate
Epistemological debate
Centered on whether theories are ultimately social
Methodological and substantial issues as post-positivist approach
Constructivism↔︎Rational, positivist approaches(liberalism,realism,Marxism)
Positivist: IR-objective,meausrable like natural sciences
Constructivism:post-positivist→social facts are not objective-facts constructed by society
Most important constructivist:Alexander Wendt:Social Theory of International Politics (1999)→initiated the fourth debate