History of Special Education and Inclusive Education

  • Before 1950s

    Before 1950s
    Before the 1950s, many students with disabilities were excluded from attending public schools.
    Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • The slow learner

    The slow learner
    In 1951 the first institution for research on exceptional children opened at the University of Illinois and began what was to become the newest focus of the field of special education: the slow learner and, eventually, what we know today as learning disability. Read more: Special Education https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2438/Special-Education.html#ixzz7WruepK84
  • Brown v. Board of Education

    Brown v. Board of Education
    The first time the federal government had advocated for students who experienced inequality and prejudice at school, and it set the path for future legislation for individuals with disabilities.
    Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

    The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
    Initiated the role of the federal government in protecting and providing for students from disadvantaged backgrounds so that they would have equal access to the public education system. Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom.
  • PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

    PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania challenged the constitutionality of excluding individuals with mental retardation from public education and training. The state was not allowed to "deny to any mentally retarded child access to a free public program of education and training."
    Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia

    Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia
    Another case in which a handicapped children had been excluded from public schools. Similar to the PARC case, this suit required the state to provide "adequate alternative education services" as well as "prior hearing and periodic review of the child's status, progress and the adequacy of any educational alternative."
    Book: Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • Vocational Rehabilitation Act (VRA) (Public Law 93-112, Section 504)

    Vocational Rehabilitation Act (VRA) (Public Law 93-112, Section 504)
    Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination based on a disability in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance including public preschool, elementary, secondary and postsecondary schools. https://disabilityrightsflorida.org/disability-topics/disability_topic_info/section_504_of_the_rehabilitation_act_of_1973
  • The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Public Law 94-142:

    The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Public Law 94-142:
    On November 19, 1975, Congress enacted Public Law 94-142 in 1975, also known as The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Congress intended that all children with disabilities would “have a right to education, and to establish a process by which State and local educational agencies may be held accountable for providing educational services for all handicapped children.”
    https://www.wrightslaw.com/law/art/history.spec.ed.law.htm
  • Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley

    Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
    Clarified the definition of a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). The court ruled that P.L. 94-142 requires states to provide support for students to benefit from a public education at a level of that of nondisabled peers. Book: Teaching Students who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • Honig v. Doe.

    Honig v. Doe.
    Benefited individuals with emotional and/or behavior disorders who have academic and social problems. Ruled that schools could not expel children for behaviors related to their disability.
    Book: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (A D A) (P.L. 101-336)

    Americans with Disabilities Act (A D A) (P.L. 101-336)
    Prohibits discrimination in the private sector and protects equal employments opportunities for people with disabilities, includes AIDS as a disability.
    Book: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A) (P.L. 101-476)

    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A) (P.L. 101-476)
    The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (E A H C
    A)(P.L. 94-142) was enacted in 1975.
    In 1990, it was reauthorized and expanded as the
    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A).
    Power Point and Book: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A) (P.L. 105-17)

    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A) (P.L. 105-17)
    Requires students with disabilities to receive services even if expelled, allows use of developmental delay category through age 9, requires access to general education curriculum and state/district-wide testing, IEP team includes a general education teacher and a behavior plan (if warranted), offers mediation options, limits attorneys fees.
    Power Point: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom
  • Cedar Rapids v. Garret F

    Cedar Rapids v. Garret F
    Garret F. a minor and quadriplegic student in Cedar Rapids Community, required a wheelchair, dependent on a ventilator. Garret's family claimed that it was the school's responsibility financially to provide health care services for Garret during school hours, but the school declined to accept it. An Administrative Law concluded that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act required the school district to provide "school health services." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36fZw-zip_A
  • No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)

    No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
    Increases accountability and flexibility in use of federal funds, offers school choice options, implements early reading interventions. Book: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA)

    Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA)
    The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I D E A), Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142), and the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (P.L. 93-112) significantly improved opportunities for individuals with disabilities.
    In 2004, it was amended by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (I D E I A).
    Power Point and Book: Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse, and At Risk in the General Education Classroom.
  • Winkelman v. Parma City School District

    Winkelman v. Parma City School District
    The Supreme Court decided that parents may pursue IDEA claims on their behalf independent of the their child's rights.