-
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996): Publication of "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"
Kuhn's most influential work, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," introduced the concept of "paradigm shifts" in the history of science. He argued that science does not progress linearly but undergoes revolutionary changes when existing paradigms are replaced by new ones. Kuhn emphasized that scientific progress is not cumulative but characterized by periods of normal science followed by paradigm shifts, which involve a fundamental reorganization of scientific theories and methods. -
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996): Introduction of the term "paradigm"
In the article, "A Function for Thought Experiments," Kuhn introduced the term "paradigm" to describe the overarching framework that guides scientific inquiry within a particular community. He highlighted the importance of shared paradigms in shaping scientific research. According to Kuhn, paradigms provide scientists with a set of accepted theories and methodologies, which collectively form the foundation for scientific practice and progress.
educational video -
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996): Elaboration on scientific revolutions
In his postscript to the second edition of "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" , Kuhn further developed his ideas on scientific revolutions. He clarified that scientific revolutions involve not only changes in theories but also alterations in the fundamental concepts and methodologies used by scientists. Kuhn argued that during revolutions, scientific communities undergo radical shifts in their worldview, leading to the abandonment of old paradigms and the emergence of new ones. -
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996): 1970-1993 Reflections on the legacy of his work
Kuhn published a collection of essays titled "The Road Since Structure." In it, he reflected on the impact and reception of his work since the "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Kuhn acknowledged the controversies around his ideas but maintained that his primary goal was to provide a descriptive account of the history and nature of scientific practice. He emphasized that his work aimed to challenge the prevailing view of scientific progress as a steady accumulation of knowledge.