-
Lowell Lectures
Thomas Kuhn challenged the traditional view of science as just an accumulation of facts, arguing that its history reveals creative processes. He introduced conceptual frameworks, highlighting how scientists' predispositions shape their understanding. Kuhn distinguished between "creative science" and "textbook science," aiming to provide a more dynamic portrayal of scientific progress and counter public misconceptions. -
Copernican Revolution
Thomas Kuhn emphasized the importance of plurality in science, arguing that scientists' philosophical and religious commitments are vital for justifying knowledge. He examined how psychological factors, alongside logical ones, hinder scientific change, as seen in the shift from the Ptolemaic to the Copernican system. Kuhn asserted that scientific progress is not linear but involves the destruction and replacement of theories, shaped by both logical and non-logical influences. -
Last Mile to Structure
Thomas Kuhn recognized the importance of understanding daily scientific work, not just major revolutions. He challenged the view that measurements only confirm theories, arguing they also show reasonable agreements between theories and observations. Kuhn differentiated normal measurements, which refine theory, from extraordinary measurements that handle unexpected results and drive breakthroughs. He believed mature science is crucial for identifying key problems and advancing knowledge. -
Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn changed our understanding of science from just a collection of facts to a historical process with stages: pre-paradigm, normal, and extraordinary science. He introduced the concept of a "paradigm," which represents the shared methods scientists use to tackle problems until new challenges create crises. Overall, Kuhn’s ideas revealed that scientific progress isn’t linear but shaped by the views of the scientific community. -
Historical and Historiographic Studies
Kuhn's study of Planck’s black-body radiation theory questioned the idea that Planck's papers-initiated quantum physics, claiming Einstein and Ehrenfest's 1906 papers were more significant. Kuhn proposed a historiography that distinguishes between internal histories of scientific ideas and external histories that consider social and cultural influences, asserting both are crucial for understanding scientific development. -
Metahistorical Studies
Kuhn distinguishes between the history and philosophy of science, arguing they serve different purposes and cannot coexist. He critiques traditional philosophy for ignoring subjective factors in theory choice, emphasizing personal experience alongside objectivity. He discusses incommensurability, suggesting that while language may differ, some communication is still possible. Ultimately, he claims that truth and objectivity are relative, shaped by the community's lexicon. -
Evolutionary Philosophy of Science
Thomas Kuhn shifted his philosophy of science from paradigms to lexicons, emphasizing how incommensurability isolates scientific communities. He compared scientific progress to biological speciation, suggesting that lexicons evolve independently and that development is non-teleological, moving away from ineffective lexicons rather than toward ultimate truths.