The history of IR as a discipline

  • "Balance of power"

    "Balance of power"
    In the first debate: Many members of international relations (liberalism) maintained that war was the result of “balance of power” and the results of misunderstanding, miscalculations and recklessness on the part of politicians. They had lost control in 1914. A more peaceful world order could be created by making foreign policy elites accountable to public opinion and by democratizing foreign policy.
  • Period: to

    1. Debate

    Ontological debate
    Liberalism (1919) vs. Realism (1939/48)
  • Edward Hallett Carr (Realist)

    Edward Hallett Carr (Realist)
    “Utopians” were quality of “naivety” which means goal stood in the way of the analyses
    This critics of Edward Hallett Carr was so-called the first debate before the WWII and continued by various scholars including Morgenthau in the US in the 1940s / 1950s
  • Hans Morgenthau

    Hans Morgenthau
    Morgenthau continued the realist critique of liberal internationalism launched by Carr.
  • Disciplinary debate

    Disciplinary debate
    Proponents of the scientific approach try to build a new theory of international politics. This led to a major disciplinary debate.
  • Period: to

    2. Debate

    Epistemological debate
    Behaviorism vs. traditionalism
  • Morgenthau's theoretical framework

    Morgenthau's theoretical framework
    Many scholars in the US believed Morgenthau’s theoretical framework was too impressionistic in nature.
  • New subfield of strategic studies

    New subfield of strategic studies
    The nuclear age led to the rise of a new subfield of strategic studies in the 1950s and 1960s. This subfield was divided into several divisions.
  • New academic departments

    New academic departments
    In the 1960s and 1970s the study of IR developed and my new academic departments appeared all over the world.
  • Rise of study of international interdependence

    Rise of study of international interdependence
    Liberal theories of interdependence and the later “neo-liberal institutionalist” analysis of international regimes argued that the economic and technological unifications of the human race required new forms of international political cooperation.
  • Period: to

    3. Debate

    Ontological debate
    Neorealism vs. neoliberalism
  • Robert O. Keohane

    Robert O. Keohane
    Robert O. Keohane wrote the book “After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy”.
  • Period: to

    4. Debate

    Epistemological debate
    Rationalism (positivist approaches) vs. Constructivism
  • Initiative of the 4. Debate: Alexander Wendt

    Initiative of the 4. Debate: Alexander Wendt
    Alexander Wendt wrote the book "Social Theory of International Politics"