-
Diana v. State Board of Education
Students are to be tested in their primary languages as well as English. Students cannot be placed in special education classes on the basis of IQ tests. -
Mills v. Board of Education
This was established to protect the rights of the child, including the parents being notified of a pending initial evaluation, reassignment, or a planned termination of special services. -
Armstrong v. Kline
Extended school year. The state's refusal to pay for schooling in excess of 180 days for children with disabilities. -
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
Appropriate Education. Courts ruled that appropriate education does not necessarily mean an education that will allow for maximum achievement. The students must be given a reasonable opportunity to learn. -
Tatro v. State of Texas
Supreme Court held that catheterization qualified as a related service under PL 94-142. -
Oberti v Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District
Placement in a general education classroom with aids and services must be offered to a student with disabilities. The student cannot be excluded from a general education classroom . -
Agostini v. Felton
Provision of services. Special educators can now provide the services needed in parochial schools rather than just private schools. -
Schaffer v. Weast
Burden of proof. Supreme courts addressed the issue of whether parents/ guardians need to provide proof about their children's IEP. -
Winkelman v. Parma City School District
Parental rights. The supreme court ruled that parents had the right to represent their children in IDEA- related court cases. -
Forest Grove School District v T.A.
Tuition reimbursement. The Supreme Court ruled that individuals with disabilities authorized reimbursement for private special education when the public school fails to .
