-
French ruler Napoleon Bonaparte’s occupation of Spain in 1808 provided Venezuelans the opportunity to declare their independence.
-Mestizos (victim) was a large group in Venezuela in which consisted of poor farmers and and peasants who wanted the same opportunities as wealthier and more privileged peninsulares (aggressor)
-French ruler Napoleon Bonaparte’s provided Venezuelans the opportunity to declare their independence as trade restrictions were lifted in which provided Mestizos with economic liberty -
Meiji Restoration in the late nineteenth century (1880-1899)
-Imperial powers (aggressor) tried to invade Japan (victim)
-Japan was able to resist the powers through military power
-the samurai leadership of Japan also made a building program to imitate the technological advancements of the West -
Emperor Menelik II of Ethiopia was able to resist the colonial powers with the help of refining his army, based on a European model.
-Emperor Menelik was fighting for the land of Ethiopia (victim)
-With the help of modern weapons and a refined army, he was able to defeat an invading Italian army (aggressor) in which ensured his people's freedom for another 4 decades -
British decided to seize a large region of Sudan from the state of Mahdiyya.
-The Mahdiyya army was fighting for their land
-British (aggressor) were trying to obtain a large portion of Sudan from the state of Mahdiyya (victim)
- Mahdiyya’s resistance was not successful as their army had lost 11,000 soldiers while the British army only lost 40 -
Conclusion of the Spanish-American War
-Filipinos (victim) were fighting for their territory against the United States (aggressor)
-A battle took place in the Philippines after the U.S. took territory
-After the the Spanish-American war the Filipinos declared their independence on January 23, 1899. -
Tilak and Gandhi’s promotes that Indians should not use military force to drive the British from India.
-India (victim) was fighting for their land in which the British (aggressor) had invaded
-Gandhi and Tilak used non-violent resistance to fight the British in which a boycott of British-made goods was used instead of an armed resistance