why did the perception of the people change towards the government change after the iraq war?
By meghanach
-
U.S. led invasion
during the begining of the invasion the opinion of the war was positive until 2006 it went south . mostly effected due to the fact that the troops had to stay in iraq longer -
blame game
Tily, Charles. "The Blame Gmae." American sociologist. 41.4 (2010).p382-389. Web illustrates the process of assigning and deflecting blame , and the varied logic and appeals in the process. -
summaries (lacks date of publish)
"Summaries." International Security .35.3 (2010): p3-6. Web -
public opinion
Silver,Allan."in time of war:understanding american public opinion from the world warII to iraq." political scince quarterly. 125.4 (2010).:p 708-709. Web opinions were based on affilition through politics rather than response to cost , casualties of war. in adam berinsky's view. -
“Omnibalancing”
Strakes,Jason E. ."The “Omnibalancing” Proposition and Baghdad’s Foreign Policy: Reinterpreting Contemporary Iraq-Iran-US Relations." Mediterranean Quarterly. 22.3,(2011) p95-108. web developing nations have often been characterized by weak institutions and unresolved internal disputes, which often take the form of mass oppo- sition movements or armed insurgencies. -
post war iraq planning
Dyson, stephen benedict."what really happened in planning for postwar iraq?," political science quarterly(Wiley-Blackwell). 128.3 (2013):p 455-488. Web. on the issue of a governance structure for postwar iraq, ther was substantial integracy debate over competing concepts and a decision, implementation of the purpose. -
Wars of Choice
Boys,James D."Exploiting Inherited Wars of Choice: Obama’s Use of Nixonian Methods to Secure the Presidency." American Politics Research.42.5 (2014) :p 815-840 .Web This article examines the manner in which Obama, like Nixon, benefited directly from conflict by promoting his opposition and apparent solutions to gain public confidence, neutralize political opponents, and secure the presidency.