Helen Elizabeth Longino

By raepps
  • Period: to

    Birth and Education

    Helen Elizabeth Longino was born on 13 July, 1944.

    She attended Barnard College earning a BA in English Literature (1966) and went on to earn a MA in Philosophy from Johns Hopkins University (1967). In 1973, she was awarded a PhD from the University of Sussex.
  • Women's Liberation Movement

    Women's Liberation Movement
    Helen Longino was active in the women's liberation movement from the 1960's thru the 1980's. In addition to the movement which resulted in awareness for women's and human rights, Helen was instrumental in developing women's study programs at educational institutions.
  • Period: to

    Professional Career

    Taught at the University of California, San Diego (1973–1975),
    Mills College (1975–1990), Rice University (1990–1995), and the University of Minnesota (1995–2005)
    Stanford University Clarence Irving Lewis Professor of Philosophy in 2008 and served as chair of the philosophy department from 2008 to 2011
  • Science of Social Knowledge

    Science of Social Knowledge
    In her first book, Science as a Social Knowledge, she argued for the relevance of Social Values.
    Was awarded the Best Book in Feminist Philosophy Prize for 2014 by the Women's Caucus of the Philosophy of Science Association
    Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Period: to

    Published Works

    Helen Longino has written three books and contributed to several other works. She has also been published in several peer reviewed journals.
  • Values in Science

    Values in Science
    While at the University of Minnesota she wrote "How Values Can Be Good For Science." They note that there is no consensus about which values are scientific and which are not, and argue that some values, like honesty, are both scientific and moral. Some also argue that employing moral values in scientific inquiries can result in positive contributions to science (e.g., Anderson, 2004; Douglas, 2009; Longino, 2004 ).
  • Fate of Knowledge

    Fate of Knowledge
    In the Fate of Knowledge, Helen critiqued science and battled sociology in science.
    This book received the Robert K. Merton Professional Award for best book from the Section for Science, Knowledge, and Technology of the American Sociological Association
    Longino, H. E. (2001). The fate of knowledge Helen E. Longino. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 5 Scientific Approaches

    5 Scientific Approaches
    Her book, Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality (2013), Longino examines five scientific approaches to human behavior.
    1. quantitative behavioral genetics
    2. molecular behavioral genetics
    3. developmental psychology
    4. neurophysiology and anatomy
    5. social/environmental methods
    Longino, H. E. (2013). Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality. University of Chicago Press.
  • Studying Human Behavior

    Studying Human Behavior
    Diving into the complexities of human behavior, Helen Longino concludes that we all bring different experiences and approaches to studying the science of human behavior. She makes conclusions on this behavioral research in scientific, social, clinical, and political spheres.
  • Period: to

    Associations and Organizations

    Served as the President of the Philosophy of Science Association (2013-2014)
    First Vice President of Division of logic, methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science (2016 - 2019)
  • Research Contribution to Philosophy

    Research Contribution to Philosophy
    Helen Longino's research is working to develop a new approach to the role of values and socio-political context in science from a feminist perspective. She argues that socio-political values are centrally important and that properly acknowledging their importance enhances rather than detracts from scientific objectivity.