Bas van fraassen

Bas van Fraassen (1941- Present)

  • An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space

    An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space
    In this book, Van Fraassen looks at many problems facing philosophy, in the study of time and space. One problem is the question of whether or not time exists. Time is relative to the events surrounding each other. Time could be mathematical, physical, or neither. The subject of space also has its problems as well. Absolute space, for example, is a topic of discussion. Van Fraassen agrees with Newton's definition, objects are seen as they are in relation to each other as opposed to on their own.
  • Precis of Laws and Symmetry

    Precis of Laws and Symmetry
    The book of Laws and Symmetry has three goals. One is to showcase problems in philosophy. The second is to undermine epistemological views (of which work in theory as opposed to observation) in the laws of nature. The third is to offer constructive criticism in the topic of the laws of nature. Van Fraassen mentions that induction, of which mainstream epistemology is based on, is not the best way to change one's opinion of nature. Observations should be the key to changing opinions.
  • Precis of The Empirical Stance

    Precis of The Empirical Stance
    This piece explains what Empiricism is, and why it should be used. Empiricism is an idea that everything has to be explained through observable rationale as opposed to theory alone. It also goes into Analytic Metaphysics, which lacks rationale to explain why certain theories are correct. He states a problem with scientific revolutions is the fact that many people dedicate their lives to prove a certain point without knowing its factually true. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brAOVfAoimQ]
  • Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective

    Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective
    There are 4 parts to this book. Part 1 talks about representation. Van Fraassen mentions that in some cases, misleading someone is necessary to get an accurate point across. In part 2 he mentions math as a form of representing, with numbers. In part 3, he argues in favor of empiricism within the structural sciences, mentioning past structuralism failed to take context/setting into account for scientific findings. In part 4, he attempts to explain why it's important to link findings with reality.