Loving v Virginia timeline

  • Richard Loving & Mildred Jeter exchange vows

    Richard Loving & Mildred Jeter exchange vows
    Richard Perry Loving, a white construction worker, marries Mildred Jeter, who is of mixed race but identifies primarily as Native American. Because the two are of different races, they can't legally marry in Virginia so they go to Washington D.C. to exchange vows.
  • The couple is arrested

    The couple is arrested
    The Caroline County prosecutor obtains arrest warrants for the couple, who have returned to Central Point, Va., to live. A few nights later the county sheriff breaks down the door and enters the Lovings' bedroom. He arrests the couple and jails them briefly.
  • The Lovings are indicted

    The Lovings are indicted
    The Lovings are indicted on felony charges of violating Virginia's anti-miscegenation law.
  • The Lovings plead guilty

    While standing trial, the Lovings decide to plead guilty as part of a deal in which the court sentences them to a year in jail but "suspend(s) said sentence … upon the provision that both accused leave … the state of Virginia at once and not return together … for a period of 25 years."
  • Richard and Mildred move to Washington

    Richard and Mildred move to Washington
    Richard and Mildred Loving move to Washington and live with Mildred's cousin and his wife. The Lovings have three children.
  • Mildred writes asking to return to Virginia

    Mildred writes asking to return to Virginia
    Mildred Loving writes to Attorney General Robert Kennedy asking that he help the family return legally to Virginia. Kennedy refers the matter to the D.C. branch of the ACLU.
  • Their lawyers ask to vacate their conviction

    Their lawyers ask to vacate their conviction
    The Lovings' ACLU lawyers ask the trial court to vacate the Lovings' conviction. The judge refuses, writing: "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix."
  • Virginia SC upholds the state's laws

    The Virginia Supreme Court upholds the state's anti-miscegenation law but rules that the trial court should not have forced the couple to leave the state.
  • The US Supreme Court hears the arguments

    The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the Loving case. The national ACLU, the NAACP, the Japanese-American Citizens League, U.S. Catholic bishops and others had filed amicus briefs in support of the Lovings.
  • Supreme Court ruling

    Supreme Court ruling
    In a unanimous ruling, the court finds that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute is unconstiutional. Chief Justice Earl Warren writes the court's opinion: "Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the state. These convictions must be reversed."