John Dupré

  • John Dupré ( 3 July 1952) - The Disunity of Science

    John Dupré ( 3 July 1952) - The Disunity of Science
    John Dupré's influential paper "The Disunity of Science" is published in Mind. This work challenges the notion that science can be unified into a single, coherent system. Dupré argues for a pluralistic approach, highlighting the complexity and diversity of the natural world, which necessitates distinct methodologies and theoretical frameworks for different scientific disciplines.
  • John Dupré (1952- ) - Critique of Genetic Determinism

    In his 2005 article "Are There Genes?" John Dupré critiques genetic determinism, arguing that genes alone do not straightforwardly determine biological traits and behaviors. He emphasizes the complex interactions between genes, cellular processes, and environmental factors, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of genetics. Dupré's arguments have influenced debates in the philosophy of biology, promoting a broader perspective that includes developmental, ecological, evolutionary contexts.
  • John Dupré 3 July 1952- Why Philosophy of Biology?

    John Dupré 3 July 1952- Why Philosophy of Biology?
    In his talk "Why Philosophy of Biology?" Dupré highlights the role of philosophy in interpreting biological science, challenging reductionist, deterministic views. He advocates for a nuanced understanding of biology that considers complexity, variability, and broader contexts like environmental influences and developmental processes. He emphasizes the importance of philosophical inquiry to ensure biological science remains open to revision and accurately reflects life's dynamic nature.
  • John Dupré (1952- ) - Process Philosophy

    John Dupré (1952- ) - Process Philosophy
    Ellen Clarke's 2014 review highlights John Dupré's advocacy for viewing biological entities as dynamic processes rather than static substances. In his book, Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Dupré argues that life is characterized by constant change and development. This perspective has significantly impacted contemporary debates in the philosophy of biology.