-
Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad Company v. City of Chicago
The case was a dispute between the fourteenth amendment, regarding the due process clause. The court sided with the City of Chicago. -
Gitlow v New York
The court ruled that the freedom of speech from the first amendment was not violated, and sided with New York. -
Near v Minnesota
Free press from the first amendment was questioned, and the court ruled with Near. -
DeJonge v Oregon
The fourteenth amendment ensured that DeJonge would stay convicted when it came to him disputing his arrest. -
Cantwell v Connecticut
The court decided that the first and fourteenth amendment protected Cantwell, and ruled in that direction. -
Emerson v Board of Education of the township of Ewing
The court decided that the amendment at question(the first) was not violated in it's establishment clause, and ruled with The Board of Education of township of Ewing. -
In re Oliver
This was the decision made by the supreme court regarding the sixth amendment for the foreseeable future. -
Mapp v Ohio
The court ruled that the fourth amendment, was indeed violated, and sided with Mapp. -
Robinson v California
The court ruled with Robinson regarding the eight amendment, more specifically, the part concerning cruel and unusual punishments. -
Edwards v South Carolina
When disputing the rights incorporating the first and fourteenth amendments, the court ruled that their freedom rights(speech, assembly, etc.) were violated, and so sided with Edwards. -
Gideon v Wainright
The sixth amendment won the court over in for Gideon and they ruled in his favor. -
Ker v California
Despite the fourth amendment, the court sided with California, saying that the events did not correlate with the aforementioned fourth amendment. -
Malloy v Hogan
Involving the fifth and fourteenth amendment, the court ruled with Malloy in their final decision. -
Pointer v Texas
The sixth amendment led to the court ruling in Pointer's favor. -
Miranda v Arizona
Including the fifth amendment, the court ruled with Miranda. -
Klopfer v North Caronlina
The court decided that Klopfer's right to a speedy trial, which was ensured in the sixth amendment, was not provided to him properly, and so, sided with him. -
Washington v Texas
The state had correlations to the sixth amendment, and the fourteenth amendment. In the end, the court sided with Washington. -
Duncan v Louisiana
With acknowledgment of the sixth amendment, the court decided to rule with Duncan. -
Benton v Maryland
The court ruled that Benton's fifth amendment was violated and ruled in his favor. -
Schilb v Kuebel
The eight amendment, involving excessive, bail was ruled in favor of Kuebel. -
Rabe v Washington
Regarding the sixth amendment, the court sided with Rabe. -
Argersinger v Hamlin
The sixth amendment led to the court ruling with Argersinger, and led to the idea that an attorney will will be provided to arrested people if they cannot afford one. -
McDonald v Chicago
The fourteenth amendment , and the second amendment were the ones at question here, and the court decided to rule with McDonald. -
Timbs v Indiana
The case involved a dispute in the eight amendment, however the court sided with Timbs in the end.
