-
Period: to
West virgina state board of education v. Barnette
- should students always slaute the flag. first amendment 3 for Barnette
- students have the opinion to salute the flag
- helped Jehobah's witnesses religious group. And free speech 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQYNtJbfBZvxdcuqgULfVZFINRvfHX8qIjcQQ&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Mapp v. Ohio
2: Dollree was charged on having obscene materials after the police searched her home was searched illegally by the police for a possible fugitive.
3: that it was a violation to the fourth amendment
4:it was an illegal search of her property
5: that even if the person is accused of having a fugitive it doesn't give the police the right to search her home without an warrant.
6: https://www.ericblankenshiplaw.com/blog/2020/september/search-warrant-basics-in-indiana/ -
Period: to
Engel v. Vitale
- did the voluntary prayer violate the first amendment 3.no prayer
- schools cant hold prayer even if participation is not required 5.limits religion in school
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYZ6ttL6asWwZCW6cPMthT-Z463W7N_wRZqA&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Gideon v, Wainwright
2 are sixth amendments their for felony defendments who are in state courts
3 for Gideon
4. the sixth amendment applies to it.
5, made sure courts gave them their basic sixth amendment rights
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRoUAIO9xVX4DIkyyZWWHZa8nnHepS8TYJ4PA&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
NY times v. sullivian
2 did Alambams law infringe on the NY times first amendment of freedom of press
3 for NY
4. the defendement needed to know if the statement was false or was reckless
5. helped out Martin Luthor king jr
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSBPRpqC7XJsERdzZdl0R95C2-fOrilrhwRWw&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Griswold v. Connecticut
2 does the constitution stop the use of contraceptives for couples, 1,3,4 and ninth amendments create martial relations
3 for griswold
4 its a right of privacy for the couple
5 ensured couples could be safe
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQI-Jn0vDa07ANVGQZyQj56fLd7SGpn0XM3sg&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Miranada v. Arizona
2 does the fifth amendment extend to police interrogation of a person if police don't mention the fifth amendment
3. for miranada
4. the police have to say the fifth amendment right while the suspect is in interrogations. so the suspect knows their rights
5. it allowed future defendents to be reminded of their rights in the future.
6.https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRYpSw8Q0eqnpYRJj8JzwxpMRTEFAsvC5fSPw&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
loving v. Virgina
2 did virginas antimiscegenation law go against the fourth amendment
3 yes
4 violated the due process of the fourteenth amendment
5: the freedom to marry and to not to marry is for the individual
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSJDAnwT183DsbXgblnXCb2ASLiiXux5eol6Q&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Tinker v. Des Moines
2 can sstopping the students from wearing armbands violate the first amendment
3 for tinker
4 its a form of speech and that the students didnt lose it when walking on school grounds
5 it just cemented the items and ideas of free speech
6. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQo47wvv04774mNxcs_ljbYwZFZNrpMnH4H7A&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Bradenburg v. Ohio
- did ohio's laws specficallt criminal syndicalism law probit Brandenburg's first amendment
- it was for Brandenburg 4.the criminal syndicalism law was too broad which made it illgeal in a sense 5.that laws must indicate both parts of the two-pronged test 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSJj3FYtu6yJPwz-jPH5km0UxGkowNOGgODfw&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Lemon v. Kurtzman
2 does funding non-public , non secular schools go agsint the first which prohibits a main religion
3 for lemon
4 too much government involvement with religion
5 it continued what the first amendment is there for which is no government involvement in religion
6. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS6zZtRViWHu5RsR4g5bVwy1b-c9EoFThRRYg&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
NY Times v. US
- the first amendment concerning Nixon preventing the publication of classified information
- yes its a violation
- the government did not overcome the " heavy presumption against" prior restraint of the press in this case 5 a future president has another reason to put out information when told too. 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQm4fY79q7cH28OLn2mDFwHsNaR4UdfqFHRPA&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
past roe v. Wade
2: 1,4,5, and ninth amendments. does a women have the right to stop their pregnancy via abortion
3 yes
4. its her body and privacy and its also for their safety if something wrong happens
5. it allowed women to choose whether to keep a baby or not
6. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSQWu_jIRZUrsybD4LywuP5Bmu6JfdmJ9_odg&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Furman v. Georgia
- was Furman's accidental killing of a resident of the home warrant Furman for the death penalty. and is it a cruel and unusual punishment fir Furman. eight amendment
- for Furman 4.in this particular cases circumstance it didnt make sense why Furman was given the death penalty
- it made states rethink their choice for capital punisments
-
Period: to
Gregg v Georgia
- was him killing and robbing a person enough for him to be sentenced to death and was it cruel and unusual. eighth amendment 3, no 4 killing someone is can cause the murderer to be given the death penalty 5 made sure the death penalty wasnt part of cruel and unusal punishments,
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-mEME9R_4hTfhM4WRbeZGSKeRldWOk4LeoQ&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
New Jersey v. TLO
- can students be searched and does it violate the fourth amendment 3 for new jersey 4 schools had to keep a safe environment for the students
- certain rights were taken for students for their safety at their respective schools 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTteryH7uzO6LgBsF_u5Y4D-wnA6Y0f63qbfg&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Employment division v. smith
2 should thestate deny umemploment privilges to a homeless worker who got fired for doing illiegal drugs which are for religoius purposes
3 for the employment division
4 religous beleifs shouldnt excuse them from from their compliance
5 if they went with smith religion would be made an excuse
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT9XXWzvvyjen3hJmlz3lIsIhmwmyMUcfThCg&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
COLB v. Hialeah
2 did the city violate the churchs first amendement by stoping the church from animal sacrifices
3 for the church
4 it shouldnt be of goverments interest
5: kept regulation of church out of it.
6. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRXlH2Q6j7Vw4EzYAwwNg7YNgHzaTmUjxn0yR8ofQbMYJMbQ9LzMlQ8sU4u4S9AwO-vnwY&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
DC v. Heller
2 did kentucky's invountary commentent procedures for retarded persons violate the fourteenth amendment
3 for heller
4 didnt violate the equal protection clause
5. helped future retarded persons cases
6. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKgZ5wtjRYmdImgAQP4e0fUNjZXi_FwLmWww&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
texas v. johnson
- eighth and fourtennth amendment. was the texas capital sentencing unconsitutional by not speaking about his youth when he comitted the crime 3 for texas 4 there was a lengthy discussion oh his past decisions and were to determine that johnson would be a threat to society
- cases about past actions as a child can be brought up. 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRGzZcrSpGoQBgNJsmzQm8fAwK5YKa1lRHnBg&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Morse v. Frederick
- first amendment. can schools stop students from displaying messages promoting the use of drugs 3 for morse
- the message was promoting drug intake
- even though students have the right to speak doesnt mean they are not limited
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTLAnSkhTl0YBuh0RXmUW6QU4ZPLJ8CzPYXrA&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Mcdonald v. chicago
2 does the secound amenement apply for the local and state goverments
3 for mcdonald
4 the 2nd amendment is fundamental and deeply rooted
5 stated the 2nd amendment was applied to the states.
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSd-n9oZg3pfXU1x-vw994i_5oMTZNmdBUbDw&usqp=CAU -
Period: to
Snyder v, phelps
- can you protest at a funeral to express free speech 3 yes
- the first amendment shields those who protest 5 if you limit it just a little and can start being limited alot down the road 6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSEpHhwzeckGB4y6xbNJH_0dG0P5Z2yZhZcTw&usqp=CAU
-
Period: to
Obergefall v.. Hodges
- does a different state or same state have to see same sex marriage as legal 3 for obergefell 4 marrying someone is what the fourteenth amendment protects and so it protects same sex and opposite sex marriage
- made same sex marriage official
- https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/portrait-two-confident-business-men-260nw-1085355872.jpg
-
Period: to
Mahaney Area School district v. B.L.
2 can public schools control off campus speech
3 for B.L.
4. it limits it but doesnt stop it and her speech did not cause any harm
5 limits schools abilty to limit free speech outside campus
6 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxBfzYk61FinwqOlPWqe-HD_FJbeTmdLUxOw&usqp=CAU
