-
Brown V. Board of Education
Children were not discriminated against the color of their skin. Caucasian-only schools were no longer permitted. This case made it so segregation in the public school setting was unconstitutional. -
Civil Rights Act
This act forbid segregation while in public. -
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act
This is based mostly on funding. This funding is to advance a child's academic options. Those who would benefit from this would be those who attend private institutions. -
PARC V. Commonwealth of PA
This guaranteed a proper education for all students, and was also the first to do so. -
Mills V. Board of Education
This indicated that children who were out of school because of a disability had a right to be included in the public school setting. Segregation is usually seen as a racial issue. In this scenario, it was seen as a exclusion because of academic, physical, and medical impairments. -
The Rehabilitation Act-504
This gives the right to a proper education that receive money from the government. -
The Education for All Handicapped Children's Act
Proper testing is required for all students that require evaluations. Once testing is complete, a plan must be created. -
Armstrong V. Kline
This states that only some students qualify for these services. There are five qualifiers that allow a student to attend Extended School Year. (ESY) -
Larry P V. Riles
IQ tests were racially biased and could not be used to determine placement and services by itself. -
Hendrick Hudson School V. Rowley
School districts are not required to provide additional services in the form of an interpreter if the student is receiving a equal education to their typical peers. -
Irving Independent School District V. Tatro
Children who are handicap have access to a school nurse or other types of medical services. -
Burlington School Committee V. DOE
Rules were put into place so that parents are informed and aware of their child's rights. These are known as procedural safeguards. -
EHA Amendment
Young children who are experiencing delays are entitled to a proper education in the public setting. -
Honig V. Doe
This case discusses that if the behavior of a child is an direct result of their disability, then they can not be suspended for an extended period of time without the school providing an appropriate education. -
Danny R.R V. State Board of Education
All children have the right to a proper education, as well as participate in social events, teams, and programs. -
EHA Amendment
Young children who are experiencing delays require a plan to be in place by the age of sixteen. -
Americans with Disabilities Act
This forbids any type of prejudice in the public setting. They are also entitled to receive federal services. -
Board of Education in Sacramento CA V. Holland
Complete inclusion for any student with a disability or special accommodation. -
Oberti V. Board of Education
The focus is on inclusion with the proper accommodations and modifications. -
Gaskin V. Commonwealth of PA
Allows for inclusion in a regular education setting with appropriate supports. -
EHA/IDEA Amendment
FAPE was part of this act. This stands for Free Appropriate Public Education. -
Cedar Rapids Community School District V. Garnett F.
School boards need to provide medical assistance to those students that need it during the school year. -
No Child Left Behind
Requires testing in certain subjects from an early age up to the middle level. Then it is only required once before graduation. -
IDEA Amendment
The promise of a free and appropriate education. -
Every Student Succeeds Act
Schools are held responsible for the type of education that all who have special needs receive. -
Endrew F. V. The Douglas County School District
All of the courts together decided that students who attended public schools had higher benefits available to them than previous courts who were lower on the totem pole.