-
Period: to
Florence County School District 4 v. Shannon Carter
Based upon the Supreme Court ruling the Respondent (Shannon Carter) won the case. According to the final ruling, parents can be reimbursed for private school tuition if the public school does not provide the student with an adequate education. -
Period: to
Florence County School District 4 vs. Shannon Carter
According to court records, this historical suit came about as a result of Florence County Schools arguing that placing financial responsibility on the school district would leave an open door to any parent/guardian to claim they are not satisfied with public schools. Based upon this claim, the parents can then decide to place their child in private school and request to be reimbursed. The respondent's parents believed she was not receiving an adequate and appropriate education. -
Period: to
Florence County School District 4 v. Shannon Carter
Florence County School District 4 v. Shannon Carter is relevant to the needs of special needs students because it holds public schools accountable for the services that are provided. Students should have access to a free and appropriate education, as outlined in their Individualized Education Program. Wrights Law (n.d.). Florence County School District IV v. Shannon Carter. Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.carter.htm -
Period: to
Hartmann v. Loudon Couny Board of Education
This case derived due to Mark's Hartmann's parents not agreeing with his IEP. The IEP attempted to change his setting to a self contained AU (autistic) classroom. To justify their proposal, Loundon County School District argued that Mark displayed disruptive behavior and did not make significant progress in the regular education classroom setting. -
Period: to
Hartmann v. Loudon County Board of Education
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner Mark Hartmann. Based upon the court ruling it was determined that the school district did not take all of the necessary steps to ensure that Mark was successful in the regular education classroom. Based upon the needs of the student, services must be provided in the Least Restrictive Environment. -
Period: to
Hartmann v. Loudon County Board of Education
Based upon this case the rights of students who may display behaviors that are deemed disruptive or undesirable are protected. A school must make every attempt to ensure that a student in successful in the regular education setting before removing him or her.
Wrights Law (n.d.). Hartmann v. Loudon County Board of Education. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Cedar-Rapids-Community-School-District-v-Garret-F. -
Period: to
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
The respondent, Garret F., won the case. Based upon the courts ruling, if support services are required they must be provided for students who need continuous and specialized care. -
Period: to
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
Garret F.'s family stated that the school district should assume financial responsibility for nursing care. while at school, due to limited psychical ability. Cedar Rapids Community School District did not feel should assume responsibility to provide the student with a specialized nurse for one on one care. Osborne, Allan (2014, Sep 23). Cedar Rapids Community School District v, Garret F. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Cedar-Rapids-Community-School-District-v-Garret-F -
Period: to
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
Based upon the court ruling,students should remain integrated in school and have additional support, as needed. Due to financial circumstances, families may not be able to provide their child with specialize care; therefore it should be mandatory that school districts ensure that all services needed are provided in order for the student to remain in school.