-
Period: to
Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District vs. Rowley 458 U.S. 176
The case did not require special instruction and supportive services provided under the law by state governments to disabled students be designed to help them achieve their full potential as learners. In 1982 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments that the Act did not require any specific services.The Rowleys had a deaf attorney. The court ruled to service handicapped students according to IDEA. This support because I use to teach a handicapped student and hes learning very well. -
Period: to
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro
In Texas 1984, they school board had to provide catheterization services during class hours to a student with spina bifida. The case stands out as the court’s first attempt to define the distinction between “school health services” and “medical services.” Tatro, the young girl, wasnt receiving CIC. The court argued that the school board provides health services by school nurses or layovers. It supports because most kids can use a PCA (LAYOVER) to help student with their needs. -
Period: to
Doug C vs. Hawaii
On December 6, 2009, Spencer C.’s father, Doug C., requested a special education due process hearing against the State of Hawaii Department of Education because Spencer’s November 9, 2009 IEP meeting was held in his absence. Doug lost at the special education due process hearing. The court ruling if a parent miss the IEP meeting nothing can change. Unless the parent refuses to attend then changes can be made. Support because most parents still do not understand IEPs they want whats best.